On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:40:11PM -0400, Corey Huinker wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:26 PM Baji Shaik <[email protected]> wrote: >> Good point. v2 moves the check inside the EXISTS as >> "AND NOT p.inherited", consistent with how the inheritance >> sections below handle it. > > The refactor I was testing differed only in having the new qual one line > higher (above the attstattarget check vs below it). Looks good to me.
We could remove the final "AND s.stainherit = p.inherited" in this part of the clause, too, right? -- nathan
