On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:41 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:27:35PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2018-09-25 11:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> PGDLLIMPORT changes don't get back-patched as well... > > > > We've been more aggressive with that lately, and I think that's good. It > > just is a unnecessarily portability barrier for extension to be > > judicious in applying that. > > Agreed. Are there any objections with the proposal of changing the > interruption pending flags in miscadmin.h to use sig_atomic_t? > ClientConnectionLost would gain PGDLLIMPORT at the same time. > I am strongly in favor of doing this. > -- > Michael > -- Best Regards, Chris Travers Head of Database Tel: +49 162 9037 210 | Skype: einhverfr | www.adjust.com Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin
