On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:27:35PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2018-09-25 11:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> PGDLLIMPORT changes don't get back-patched as well... > > We've been more aggressive with that lately, and I think that's good. It > just is a unnecessarily portability barrier for extension to be > judicious in applying that.
Agreed. Are there any objections with the proposal of changing the interruption pending flags in miscadmin.h to use sig_atomic_t? ClientConnectionLost would gain PGDLLIMPORT at the same time. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
