On 12/09/2018 10:15, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-07 > <CAEepm=1xgtsldx63uedcj8mdg63cnj-tsdwhbh9djtvxrh5...@mail.gmail.com> >> 2. We could remove datcollate and datctype and instead store a >> collation OID. I'm not sure what problems would come up, but for >> starters it seems a bit weird to have a shared catalog pointing to >> rows in a non-shared catalog. > > Naive idea: make that catalog shared? Collations are system-wide after > all.
By the same argument, extensions should be shared, but they are not. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
