Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-07 
<CAEepm=1xgtsldx63uedcj8mdg63cnj-tsdwhbh9djtvxrh5...@mail.gmail.com>
> 2.  We could remove datcollate and datctype and instead store a
> collation OID.  I'm not sure what problems would come up, but for
> starters it seems a bit weird to have a shared catalog pointing to
> rows in a non-shared catalog.

Naive idea: make that catalog shared? Collations are system-wide after
all.

Christoph

Reply via email to