Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-07 <CAEepm=1xgtsldx63uedcj8mdg63cnj-tsdwhbh9djtvxrh5...@mail.gmail.com> > 2. We could remove datcollate and datctype and instead store a > collation OID. I'm not sure what problems would come up, but for > starters it seems a bit weird to have a shared catalog pointing to > rows in a non-shared catalog.
Naive idea: make that catalog shared? Collations are system-wide after all. Christoph