Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance

[shveta malik]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 9:57 AM Ajin Cherian <itsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Updated the patch with a tap test.
> Attaching patch v17 which has a tap test to test the feature added.
>

Thanks for the patch. I noticed that in the case of API, we are
passing 'some_slot_updated' as always false to
wait_for_slot_activity(). Shouldn't we pass it as actual value just
like slotsync worker does? There may be a case that in a given cycle,
one of the temp slots is persisted or one of the persisted slots is
updated, in such a case we should not double the naptime. The naptime
doubling logic is only when there is no activity happening on primary.

thanks
Shveta