On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 09:32:41AM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > On 01/09/2025 10:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> Also rethinking this aspect: a checksum failure probably *isn't* going >> to make much difference. Since that'll also cause bigger problems for >> VACUUM than logging one of these "failed to re-find parent key" >> messages. > > But vacuum is not just logging this message. It throws error which means > that vacuum for this relation will be performed any more.
Yeah. For a long-running autovacuum job, getting potentially random in-flight failures is always annoying, more if these jobs deal with wraparound. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
