> On 18 Sep 2025, at 7:28 AM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:26:12AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Saying that, this patch sounds like a good idea, making these code >> paths a bit more reliable for VACUUM, without paying the cost of an >> allocation. At least for HEAD, that's nice to have. Peter, what do >> you think? > > Hearing nothing, I'm planning to have a second look at it and do > something on HEAD. Feel free if you have any comments. > — > Michael
Attached please find rebased version of the patch with fixed mistypings.
v3_bt_split.patch
Description: Binary data
