On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 at 22:28, Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@kurilemu.de> wrote: > > On 2025-Jul-24, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > > I just happened to look into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/52/ > > and saw plenty of "Active patches" there. > > > > I guess that's a consequence of the new rule established in [1]. > > I don't know about the rest of it, but I moved all the entries in the > "Bug Fixes" category to the PG19-2 commitfest. > > As for the others: > > > Are they supposed to stay like that? Should they be closed? > > If yes, "Returned with Feedback"? Or some new state "Abandoned"? > > > [1]: > > https://postgr.es/m/003e3a66-8fcc-4ca0-9e0e-c0afda1c9424%40eisentraut.org > > I *think* we should close the Waiting-on-author ones as Returned with > Feedback, and ping the authors of the rest so that each author moves > their patches forward, with a reasonable deadline (two weeks?); we close > patches that aren't moved by then. > > Right now we have: > > Waiting on author: 14 patches > Needs review: 13 patches > Ready for committer: 4 patches
Some patches marked as "Waiting on Author" were not updated to "Needs Review" after they posted a new version, so I haven't returned all of them. For the ones that are still open, I’ve sent a private email to the respective authors. Let’s wait a bit and see if they show interest. Regards, Vignesh
