On 2025-Jul-24, Laurenz Albe wrote: > I just happened to look into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/52/ > and saw plenty of "Active patches" there. > > I guess that's a consequence of the new rule established in [1].
I don't know about the rest of it, but I moved all the entries in the "Bug Fixes" category to the PG19-2 commitfest. As for the others: > Are they supposed to stay like that? Should they be closed? > If yes, "Returned with Feedback"? Or some new state "Abandoned"? > [1]: > https://postgr.es/m/003e3a66-8fcc-4ca0-9e0e-c0afda1c9424%40eisentraut.org I *think* we should close the Waiting-on-author ones as Returned with Feedback, and ping the authors of the rest so that each author moves their patches forward, with a reasonable deadline (two weeks?); we close patches that aren't moved by then. Right now we have: Waiting on author: 14 patches Needs review: 13 patches Ready for committer: 4 patches It's not a lot. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
