Hi,
> * Using a DSA from the registry is cumbersome. You essentially need > another batch of shared memory to keep track of the pointers and do > locking, so it might not be tremendously useful on its own. AFAICT the > easiest thing to do is to store the DSA pointers in a dshash table, which > is what I've done in the test. I am considering whether it would be better to avoid creating another DSM segment to track the DSA handle. Would it make more sense to track the DSAs in a separate dshash registry similar to DSM segments? + /* Attach to existing DSA. */ + dsa = dsa_attach(state->dsah); + dsa_pin_mapping(dsa); + + *found = true; + } Should this also consider the case where dsa is already mapped, to avoid the error on attaching to the DSA twice? IIUC, that would require calling dsa equivalent of dsm_find_mapping(). Thank you, Rahila Syed
