> On 24 Apr 2025, at 19:10, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I thought about that but intentionally left it as-is, because that > would force zeroing of the space reserved for the hashtable name too. > That's unnecessary, and since it'd often be odd-sized it might result > in a less efficient fill loop. Well, that's just few hundred bytes at most. But I agree that makes sense. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
- [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocation failure check m . korotkov
- Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocation failu... Andrey Borodin
- Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocation f... m . korotkov
- Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocation failu... Aleksander Alekseev
- Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocation failu... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocation f... Andrey Borodin
- Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocati... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allo... Andrey Borodin