On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 8:34 AM Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> wrote: > I agree with this reasoning and retract my suggestion to rename the option.
(Thank you for chiming in; having the packager feedback has been extremely helpful.) While I have you, may I ask whether you're okay (from the packager perspective) with the current division of dynamic and static behaviors? Dynamic: --with-libcurl builds a runtime-loadable module, and if you don't install it, OAuth isn't supported (i.e. it's optional) Static: --with-libcurl builds an additional linkable staticlib, which you must link into your application (i.e. not optional) I want to make absolutely sure the existing packager requests are not conflicting. :D Thanks, --Jacob
