On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:49 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > > By adding the new .so to a different package. For example, RPM specs > > would just let you say "hey, this .so I just built doesn't go into the > > main client package, it goes into an add-on that depends on the client > > package." It's the same way separate client and server packages get > > generated from the same single build of Postgres. > > Do we have any idea how many packagers are interested in doing this?
I'm not sure how to answer this. The primary drivers from the dev side are you and Tom, I think. Christoph seems to be on board with a split as long as we don't make his life harder. Wolfgang appears to be a packager who would not make use of a split (and in fact cannot). --Jacob
