On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:33 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 09:17:03AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > > It allows packagers to ship the OAuth library separately, so end users
> > > that don't want the additional exposure don't have to install it at
> > > all.
> >
> > Okay, so how would they do that? I understand how that would happen if
> > it was an external extension, but how if it is under /src or /contrib.
>
> By adding the new .so to a different package. For example, RPM specs
> would just let you say "hey, this .so I just built doesn't go into the
> main client package, it goes into an add-on that depends on the client
> package." It's the same way separate client and server packages get
> generated from the same single build of Postgres.
Do we have any idea how many packagers are interested in doing this?
> > Would we have to put out minor releases for curl CVEs?
>
> In general, no.
Good.
FYI, I saw bug bounty dollar amounts next to each curl CVE:
https://curl.se/docs/security.html
No wonder some people ask for bounties.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
