Great, TODO item removed, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 04:29:39PM -0400, Seth Robertson wrote: > > Yes, at first glance the service file looks like it should work and is > a much more elegant and generic method than my proposed hack. I can't > trivially tell if the ssl configuration aspect of it was available in > 8.3/8.4, but that isn't overly relevant since it is certainly > available now. > > Thanks! > -Seth Robertson > > From: Jacob Champion > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 09:52:49 -0700 > To: Seth Robertson, > To: Robin Haberkorn > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq > v1 > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:01 AM Seth Robertson > <in-pgsql-hack...@baka.org> wrote: > > Third, the only real use case where this feature would be critical is > > a client which needs to have connections to two different PostgreSQL > > servers at the same time. Those applications are likely fairly rare > > and doing custom programming to support different filenames would > > likely be warranted. > > Can this be handled well enough with a service file? > > > Given the lack of "me too" or "+1" posts over the past 16 years, I > > suspect there may be features with higher user benefit. I would not > > cry if it gets removed. > > Yeah, at least not without a solid use case. (If anyone does feel > motivated to pick it up, be aware of the server-side SNI work [1]. > It'd be nice if the two halves were complementary -- or at minimum, > not clashing with each other.) > > Thanks! > --Jacob > > [1] https://postgr.es/m/1C81CD0D-407E-44F9-833A-DD0331C202E5%40yesql.se > > -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
