On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:01 AM Seth Robertson <in-pgsql-hack...@baka.org> wrote: > Third, the only real use case where this feature would be critical is > a client which needs to have connections to two different PostgreSQL > servers at the same time. Those applications are likely fairly rare > and doing custom programming to support different filenames would > likely be warranted.
Can this be handled well enough with a service file? > Given the lack of "me too" or "+1" posts over the past 16 years, I > suspect there may be features with higher user benefit. I would not > cry if it gets removed. Yeah, at least not without a solid use case. (If anyone does feel motivated to pick it up, be aware of the server-side SNI work [1]. It'd be nice if the two halves were complementary -- or at minimum, not clashing with each other.) Thanks! --Jacob [1] https://postgr.es/m/1C81CD0D-407E-44F9-833A-DD0331C202E5%40yesql.se
