On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:35 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I haven't looked closely at this version but I did notice that you do > > not document that parallel vacuum disables eager scanning. Imagine you > > are a user who has set the eager freeze related table storage option > > (vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate) and you schedule a regular > > parallel vacuum. Now that table storage option does nothing. > > Good point. That restriction should be mentioned in the documentation. > I'll update the patch.
Yea, I mean, to be honest, when I initially replied to the thread saying I thought temporarily disabling eager scanning for parallel heap vacuuming was viable, I hadn't looked at the patch yet and thought that there was a separate way to enable the new parallel heap vacuum (separate from the parallel option for the existing parallel index vacuuming). I don't like that this disables functionality that worked when I pushed the eager scanning feature. - Melanie
