On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 11:57 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Michael,
>
> > Maybe we don't need a short option at all for this, at least initially?
>
> Indeed, updated.

Thank you for updating the patch. Here are some minor comments:

         The <option>--two-phase</option> can be specified with
         <option>--create-slot</option> to enable decoding of prepared
transactions.
+        Also, <option>--falover</option> can be specified with
+        <option>--create-slot</option> to create replication slot which can be
+        synchronized to the standby.

How about rewording the whole sentence like:

+        The <option>--two-phase</option> and
<option>--failover</option> options
+        can be specified with <option>--create-slot</option>.

Explaining both options here seems redundant to me.

---
+       <para>
+        Allows created replication slot to be synchronized to the standbys.
+        This option may only be specified with <option>--create-slot</option>.
+       </para>

How about slightly rewording to like:

+        Enables the slot to be synchronized to the standbys. This
option may only be
+        specified with <option>--create-slot</option>.

Also, the descriptions of pg_recvlogical options are written in
alphabetical order. Please put the description for --failover option
after -E/--endpos.

The rest looks good to me.

Regards,


--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


Reply via email to