Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> What precisely are you proposing?
> Inserting AcceptInvalidationMessages() in some location that > guarantees it will be executed at least once per SQL statement. I > tentatively propose the beginning of parse_analyze(), but I am open to > suggestions. What will that accomplish that the existing call in transaction start doesn't? It might make the window for concurrency issues a bit narrower, but it certainly doesn't close it. regards, tom lane