Hi, On 2018-08-02 15:57:13 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> Right. If nobody sees a reason not to change that, I think we should. > >> It would make the behavior more predictable with, I hope, no real > >> loss. > > > > What precisely are you proposing? > > Inserting AcceptInvalidationMessages() in some location that > guarantees it will be executed at least once per SQL statement. I > tentatively propose the beginning of parse_analyze(), but I am open to > suggestions.
I'm inclined to think that that doesn't really actually solve anything, but makes locking issues harder to find, because the window is smaller, but decidedly non-zero. Can you describe why this'd make things more "predictable" precisely? Greetings, Andres Freund
