On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 2:55 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > Continuing on with Unicode 15.1 and accepting the unassigned code point > *cannot* prevent breakage.
Under your definition, this is true, but I think Jeremy would define breakage differently. His primary concern, I expect, is *stability*. Breakage means that the same supposedly-stable results return different answers on the same data. Under that definition, continuing under Unicode 15.1 does prevent breakage. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com