On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 14:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > And nobody has refuted the argument that refusing to > update the Unicode tables will cause other problems (such as not > knowing what to do with new code points that are added in the other > places where those tables are used).
The argument is irrefutable. I can only utter my (unproven) conviction that the complaints about some outlandish character being converted to upper case in the wrong way won't be as loud as the complaints about a corrupted index. But perhaps both occurrences would be rare enough that there is little point in arguing at all. > People who aren't doing the work > to improve the infrastructure don't get to hold the longstanding > process hostage. Actually, I am arguing for *not* doing the work... Yours, Laurenz Albe
