On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 9:42 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:49AM +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote: > > If you can't work for ther patch for a while because you are busy or > > other some reason, > > I can become additinal reviewer and apply review comments from Micael > > to the patch instead of you. > > > > If you don't want my action, please reply and notice me that. If > > possible, within a week :) > > Putting a bit of context here. Most of the Postgres hackers based in > Japan had a meeting last Friday, and Kanbayashi-san has asked me about > patches that introduce to simpler code paths in the tree that could be > worked on for this release. I've mentioned this thread to him. > > > Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your > > contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost. > > Authors and reviewers get busy because of life and work matters, and > contributions are listed in the commit logs for everybody who > participates. If you can help move this patch forward, thanks a lot > for the help! IMO, that would be great. The patch set still needs > more reorganization and adjustments, but I think that we can get it > there.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 3:07 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 08:53 +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote: > > Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your > > contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost. > > > > TO: Mecael and other hackers, > > > > There are any problem in light of community customs? > > Anything submitted to the mailing list is no longer private > intellectual property. You are free and welcome to start working > on any patch that you are interested in and that seems neglected > by the author. There is no problem with listing more than one > author. Michael and Laurenz, Thank you for context description and comments to my action :) I start coding to complete the patch :) --- Great regards, Ryo Kanbayashi
