On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 1:43 AM Filip Janus <fja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I apologize for multiple messages, but I found a small bug in the previous > version. > > -Filip-
Great, thank you for your work. I think the patches could use a pgindent run. I don't see a reason why the temp file compression method should be different from the wal compression methods, which we already have in-tree. Perhaps it would be nice to have a 0001 patch, which would abstract the compression methods we now have for wal into a separate file containing GUC option values and functions for compress/decompress. Then, 0002 would apply this to temporary file compression. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
