On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 11:21 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:58:43PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: > True. One small thing we could do is to require "found_objs" (the double > pointer) to always be non-NULL, but that just compels some callers to > provide otherwise-unused variables. I've left the interface alone for now.
One thing to consider is that a pointer named "dummy" is self-documenting. > > That's better, and if we end up with this interface, we'll want quotes > > around the names so the eye can tell where the "*" belong. > > I did that in v3. I also tried to break up this comment into bullet points > for better separation and logical flow. That's much easier to follow, thanks. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
