Hi Amit, On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:26 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: [..]
OK, sure. > How about something like: "Note that if the clock on standby is moved > ahead or backward, the feedback message may not be sent at the > required interval. This can lead to prolonged risk of not removing > dead rows on primary for extended periods as the feedback mechanism is > based on timestamp." Sure thing. I've just added '(..) In the extreme cases this can..' as it is pretty rare to hit it. Patch attached. -J.
v2-0001-doc-Mention-clock-synchronization-recommendation-.patch
Description: Binary data
