Hi,
On 2025-02-27 12:44:24 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > CID 1592454: (#1 of 1): Explicit null dereferenced (FORWARD_NULL)
> > 8. var_deref_op: Dereferencing null pointer per_buffer_data.
>
> That's exactly what the messages you quoted are discussing, no?
Ah, no, it isn't. But I still think the coverity alert and the patch don't
make sense, as per the below:
> > diff --git a/src/backend/storage/aio/read_stream.c
> > b/src/backend/storage/aio/read_stream.c
> > index 04bdb5e6d4..18e9b4f3c4 100644
> > --- a/src/backend/storage/aio/read_stream.c
> > +++ b/src/backend/storage/aio/read_stream.c
> > @@ -666,6 +666,8 @@ read_stream_next_buffer(ReadStream *stream, void
> > **per_buffer_data)
> >
> > READ_BUFFERS_ISSUE_ADVICE : 0)))
> > {
> > /* Fast return. */
> > + if (per_buffer_data)
> > + *per_buffer_data =
> > get_per_buffer_data(stream, oldest_buffer_index);
> > return buffer;
> > }
>
> A few lines above:
> Assert(stream->per_buffer_data_size == 0);
>
> The fast path isn't used when per buffer data is used. Adding a check for
> per_buffer_data and assigning something to it is nonsensical.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
