On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:55 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I was working on expanding tests for AIO and as part of that wrote a test for > temp tables -- our coverage is fairly awful, there were many times during AIO > development where I knew I had trivially reachable temp table specific bugs > but all tests passed. > > The test for that does trigger the problem described above and is fixed by the > patches in this thread (which I included in the other thread):
Thanks. Alright, I'm assuming that you don't have any objections to the way I restyled that API, so I'm going to go ahead and push some of these shortly, and then follow up with a few newer patches that simplify and improve the look-ahead and advice control. More very soon.
