On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 9:44 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:36:35AM +0900, Richard Guo wrote: > > I plan to push this shortly. This is arguably a bug, but it hasn't > > caused any real issues, and nobody has complained about it until now, > > so I don't think it needs to be back-patched. Any thoughts? > > I can see a point in doing a backpatch to keep the code consistent > across branches, and this avoids incorrect access patterns when > copy-pasting this code.
Hmm, fair point. I will backpatch-through 13. Thanks Richard
