On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:36:35AM +0900, Richard Guo wrote: > I plan to push this shortly. This is arguably a bug, but it hasn't > caused any real issues, and nobody has complained about it until now, > so I don't think it needs to be back-patched. Any thoughts?
I can see a point in doing a backpatch to keep the code consistent across branches, and this avoids incorrect access patterns when copy-pasting this code. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
