On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 10:02 AM Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fixed. Holding off on posting updated patch pending decision on what's the >>> best thing to do with partitioned indexes. >> >> > Though I was able to get it to work multiple ways, the one that seems to > make the most sense given Michael and Jeff's feedback is to handle > partitioned indexes, do the ACL checks against the underlying table just > like indexes, but take a ShareUpdateExclusiveLock on the partitioned index > as well, because it doesn't have the same special case > in check_inplace_rel_lock() that regular indexes do. > > In the future, if check_inplace_rel_lock() changes its special case to > include partitioned indexes, then this code can get marginal simpler. > > New patchset, no changes to 0002 as work continues there. > Thought I sent this to the list, but apparently I only sent to Michael. The changes referenced are in v45, already posted to the list.
