On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:12:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane <htamf...@gmail.com> writes: >> I toyed with that for a bit, but as you say, without generating a ton of >> combinations to translate, we'd have to fall back on run-time >> constructions. Neither is ideal. I also realized that I almost never type >> "\dti". Very common for me are \d and \dt and \dv etc. but combinations are >> something I never bother with. At that point, I just do a \d. I think given >> how rare (granted, anecdotally) those combinations are, it's okay if we >> expose people to the "r" word. > > Fair. This is already a step forward, so it doesn't have to be > perfect.
+1. I don't use combinations like \dti regularly, either. -- nathan
