On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 12:34, Shubham Khanna
<khannashubham1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:12 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 10:48, Shubham Khanna
> > <khannashubham1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 3:28 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Shubham.
> > > >
> > > > Patch v9-0001 LGTM.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Upon reviewing the v9-0001 patch, I noticed that running 'pg perltidy'
> > > was necessary. To ensure the patch adheres to the required coding
> > > standards, I have applied 'pg perltidy' and made the necessary
> > > adjustments.
> > > The attached patch includes these formatting fixes along with the
> > > latest changes.
> > >
> > Hi Shubham,
> >
> > I reviewed the v10 patch. I have following comments:
> >
> > 1. The documentation is added under the prerequisite section. And the
> > prerequisite section states that
> >    ' There are some prerequisites for
> >     <application>pg_createsubscriber</application> to convert the target 
> > server
> >     into a logical replica.  If these are not met, an error will be 
> > reported.'
> >
> > But for our case we are giving a warning only during the dry run. So,
> > I feel we should add the documentation under the 'Warnings' section.
> >
> > 2. Spacing is not consistent with the rest of document:
> >
> > +   Replication failures can occur if required WAL files are missing. To 
> > prevent
> > +   this, the source server must set <xref
> > linkend="guc-max-slot-wal-keep-size"/>
> > +   to <literal>-1</literal> to ensure that required WAL files are not
> > +   prematurely removed.
> >
> > For the above added line, we should add a space before each line.
> >
>
> Fixed the given comments. The attached patch contains the suggested changes.
>
Hi Shubham,

I reviewed the v11 patch and it looks good to me.

Thanks and Regards,
Shlok Kyal


Reply via email to