Hi! Thanks for your work! it is very useful.

On 14.01.2025 05:09, Nathan Bossart wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 05:17:11PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote:
I propose renaming the GUC from "autovacuum_max_threshold" to
"autovacuum_vacuum_max_threshold" to clarify that it applies only
to the vacuum operation performed by autovacuum, not to the analyze operation.
This will also align with naming for other related GUCs, i.e.,
"autovacuum_analyze_threshold" and "autovacuum_vacuum_threshold."

The "vacuum threshold" calculation described in [1] will also need to be
updated.
Good call.  Here is an updated patch.

I found one minor mistake in postgresql.conf:

#autovacuum_vacuum_max_threshold = 100000000    # max number of row updates
                        # before vacuum; -1 disables max
                        # threshold

I think instead of "# threshold" should be "#vacuum"?


There is a typo:

* if (threshold > vac_max_thresh)
* threshold = vac_max_thres; - here

I think you should add more information to the description of the Relations_needs_vacanalyze function: what is vac_max_thresh and how is it calculated. It is not clear what the below condition means.

/* -1 is used to disable max threshold */
vac_max_thresh= (relopts&& relopts->vacuum_max_threshold>= -1)
? relopts->vacuum_max_threshold
: autovacuum_vac_max_thresh;

--
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional

Reply via email to