I wrote:
> I reviewed and pushed these.  Let's not forget that the pageinspect
> one is still pending, though.  We were waiting on Tomas' fix, which
> is now pushed at 957ba9ff1, so I suppose it needs a rebase.

Actually ... that one's quite trivial, so I went ahead and pushed it.

The submitted patch had the functions as PARALLEL SAFE, but I think
they have to remain PARALLEL RESTRICTED because they use
tuple_data_split(), cf pageinspect--1.10--1.11.sql.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to