Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Doing that step-by-step is better than nothing, hence limiting the use
> of named parameters for only the functions whose body is rewritten is
> fine by me, as a first step, as long as the names are used rather the
> dollar parameter numbers. I'd suggest to do take the bonus step of
> applying the same rule to all the other functions so as everything
> applies with the same extension update in a single major release.
> Perhaps on top of the patches already proposed? There is no need for
> an extra version bump if all that is done in the same development
> cycle.
FWIW, I don't agree at all with doing argument name addition in
this patchset. Certainly that's a fine thing to do, but it's an
independent issue and should be handled in an independent patch.
I see that the cfbot is unhappy because it doesn't understand
that some of the patches have been applied already. I am going
to go ahead and get the earthdistance one done, because we have
a live problem report about that [1]. I'll rebase and repost
the remainder afterwards.
regards, tom lane
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6a6439f1-8039-44e2-8fb9-59028f7f2014%40mailbox.org
