Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > If someone wants to define things like that before potentially > including system headers, they're not going about it the right way if > they're including our headers first (or anything at all not under > their direct control). But OK, I can work with the > not-broken-so-don't-fix-it and > pulling-in-more-stuff-that-maybe-they-don't-want arguments. :-)
v2 LGTM.
regards, tom lane
