On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:55 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > ... We need this header to be readable without
> > any prior system headers, so I'm afraid we're all the way back to
> > making configure derive the name of a 64-bit type.
>
> Could another way be to read pg_config.h before postgres_ext.h?
> I think the current order was intentional, but maybe the
> disadvantages outweigh the advantages now.

Yeah I was just testing that idea :-)  I can't see why it needs to be
first, but was looking for what the original reason was...


Reply via email to