On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:55 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: > > ... We need this header to be readable without > > any prior system headers, so I'm afraid we're all the way back to > > making configure derive the name of a 64-bit type. > > Could another way be to read pg_config.h before postgres_ext.h? > I think the current order was intentional, but maybe the > disadvantages outweigh the advantages now.
Yeah I was just testing that idea :-) I can't see why it needs to be first, but was looking for what the original reason was...