> On 22 Nov 2024, at 03:02, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> I don't
> love having to put RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP() checks everywhere either.
+1. I do not understand why this restriction (protecting temp tables from
access) is a responsibility of the buffer manager.
Actually, I like the idea that superuser knows better what to do.
What if we say it's not a bug, but a feature. Will it break some contracts with
user or some functionality?
It seems that protection of temp tables should belong to ACL stuff. And in a
logic of this subsystem would be natural to just allow superuser do whatever
they want with.
Is it some lunatic idea? Or does it make some sense?
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
