Em qui., 14 de nov. de 2024 às 07:09, Bertrand Drouvot < bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 09:27:06AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Makes sense to me to just do that, with a first < 8 loop, and a second > > for the 8~63 range. > > Thanks for looking at it! > > > There is also a "cant'" in the last size_t check. Simple typo. > > Please find attached v12, with more comments and comments changes to > explain > the multiple cases (for safety) and phases (for efficiency). > Is it worth mentioning that pg_memory_is_all_zeros does not work correctly on 32-bit systems? (63 < (size_t) * 8) /* 63 - 32*/ Or do we adjust magic constants according to 32/64 bit? best regards, Ranier Vilela
