On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:22 PM shveta malik <shveta.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Please find the attached v46 patch having changes for the above review > > comments and your test review comments and Shveta's review comments. > > > > Thanks for addressing comments. > > Is there a reason that we don't support this invalidation on hot > standby for non-synced slots? Shouldn't we support this time-based > invalidation there too just like other invalidations? >
I don’t see any reason to *not* support this invalidation on hot standby for non-synced slots. Therefore, I’ve added the same in v48. -- Thanks, Nisha
