On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:20 AM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > The existing IN() syntax somehow manages to produce a useful bigint[] > SAOP when I use the same mix of integer types/constants that were used > for my original test case from yesterday:
Interesting. I would not have guessed that. I wonder how it works. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
