On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 11:24:46AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Corey (added in CC.), has noticed that the issue fixed by c3315a7 in > 16~ for advisory locks is not complicated to reach, leading to > failures in some of our automated internal stuff. A cherry-pick of > c3315a7 works cleanly across 12~15. Would there be any objections if > I were to backpatch this part down to 12? > > The problems fixed by 6a20b04 have not really been an issue here, > hence I'd rather let things be as they are for the conflicting role > names.
Hearing nothing, done. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
