On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:52:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > For the archives' sake: this has been applied as of 6a20b04 and > c3315a7.
Corey (added in CC.), has noticed that the issue fixed by c3315a7 in 16~ for advisory locks is not complicated to reach, leading to failures in some of our automated internal stuff. A cherry-pick of c3315a7 works cleanly across 12~15. Would there be any objections if I were to backpatch this part down to 12? The problems fixed by 6a20b04 have not really been an issue here, hence I'd rather let things be as they are for the conflicting role names. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
