David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 12:33, Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I normally build the code with warnings enabled (specifically,
>> -Wshadow) which exposes many "shadowed" declarations.
> 0fe954c28 did add -Wshadow=compatible-local to the standard set of
> complication flags. I felt it was diminishing returns after that, but
> -Wshadow=local would be the next step before going full -Wshadow.
I think that insisting that local declarations not shadow globals
is an anti-pattern, and I'll vote against any proposal to make
that a standard warning. Impoverished as C is, it does have block
structure; why would we want to throw that away by (in effect)
demanding a single flat namespace for the entire program?
I do grant that sometimes shadowing of locals can cause bugs. I don't
recall right now why we opted for -Wshadow=compatible-local over
-Wshadow=local, but we could certainly take another look at that.
regards, tom lane
