Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> writes: > An alternative way would be that we store the char signedness in the > control file, and gin_trgm_ops opclass reads it if the bytes in the > meta page shows 'unset'. The char signedness in the control file > doesn't mean to be used for the compatibility check for physical > replication but used as a hint. But it also could be a bit messy, > though.
Yeah, that seems like it could work. But are we sure that replicas get a copy of the primary's control file rather than creating their own? regards, tom lane