> On 4 Sep 2024, at 03:25, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 12:00:13PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> I see your v17 typo fixes, and raise you a few more. Commit 31a98934d169 >> from >> just now contains 2 (out of 3) sets of typos introduced in v17 so they should >> follow along when you push the ones mentioned here. > > Is that really mandatory? I tend to worry about back branches only > when this stuff is user-visible, like in the docs or error messages. > This opinion varies for each individual, of course. That's just my > lazy opinion.
Not mandatory at all, but since you were prepping a typo backpatch anyways I figured these could join to put a small dent in reducing risks for future backports. -- Daniel Gustafsson
