On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 8:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:25:25AM +0800, SAMEER KUMAR wrote: > > I think it is important to indicate that the group leader is responsible > > for clearing the transaction ID/transaction status of other backends > > (including this one). > > Your proposal is > > Waiting for the group leader process to clear the transaction ID of > this backend at the end of a transaction. > > Waiting for the group leader process to update the transaction status > for this backend. > > Mine is > > Waiting for the group leader to clear the transaction ID at > transaction > end. > > Waiting for the group leader to update transaction status at > transaction end. > > IMHO the latter doesn't convey substantially less information, and it fits > a little better with the terse style of the other wait events nearby. >
+1 for Nathan's version. It is quite close to the previous version, for which we haven't heard any complaints since they were introduced. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
