Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 2:46 AM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> I propose to fix that by making a copy of the scan keys passed by the >> caller and make the modifications there.
> This does have the disadvantage of adding more palloc overhead.
It seems hard to believe that one more palloc + memcpy is going to be
noticeable in the context of an index scan.
regards, tom lane
